Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stratford School

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Never ever close this early but as noted below High/Secondary Schools are always kept per SCHOOLOUTCOMES so wrapping it up now, Consensus could change but it's extremely unlikely!. (non-admin closure) –Davey2010^Talk 20:10, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Stratford School

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Lack of notablity. No reliable sources FiendYT (talk) 01:56, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Musa Talk 04:20, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Musa Talk 04:21, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: like most schools, there could be an article if someone would do some serious research, but no great loss if this stubby article is removed. - Jmabel | Talk 05:14, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - As general consensus that secondary/high schools are inherently notable. "Most ... high schools are usually kept except when zero independent sources can be found to prove that the institution actually exists." as WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES. With Ofsted reports and DfE Stats the school clearly exists, and these are clearly reliable sources, despite the nomination. - Arjayay (talk) 09:01, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Stratford School

zproxy.org